選択できるのは25トピックまでです。 トピックは、先頭が英数字で、英数字とダッシュ('-')を使用した35文字以内のものにしてください。
aaaaaa aaaaaaa c7b6246025 export symbols in test_cases 7年前
..
README.md recreate project as DLL 7年前
advanced_instructions.asm recreate project as DLL 7年前
advanced_instructions.h export symbols in test_cases 7年前
assemble.ps1 recreate project as DLL 7年前
backwards.asm recreate project as DLL 7年前
backwards.h export symbols in test_cases 7年前
catch.hpp recreate project as DLL 7年前
export.def export symbols in test_cases 7年前
main.cpp export symbols in test_cases 7年前
simple_tests.asm recreate project as DLL 7年前
simple_tests.h export symbols in test_cases 7年前
test_cases.h export symbols in test_cases 7年前
test_cases.vcxproj export symbols in test_cases 7年前
test_cases.vcxproj.filters export symbols in test_cases 7年前

README.md

Introduction

This project aims to give a simple overview on how good various x64 hooking engines (on windows) are. I’ll try to write various functions, that are hard to patch and then see how each hooking engine does.

I’ll test:

(I’d like to test detours, but I’m not willing to pay for it. So that isn’t tested :( )

There are multiple things that make hooking difficult. Maybe you want to patch while the application is running -- in that case you might get race conditions, as the application is executing your half finished hook. Maybe the software has some self protection features (or other software on the system provides that, e.g. Trustee Rapport)

Evaluating how the hooking engines stack up against that is not the goal here. Neither are non-functional criteria, like how fast it is or how much memory it needs for each hook. This is just about the challenges the function to be hooked itself poses.

Namely:

  • Are jumps relocated?
  • What about RIP adressing?
  • If there’s a loop at the beginning / if it’s a tail recurisve function, does the hooking engine handle it?
  • How good is the dissassembler, how many instructions does it know?
  • Can it hook already hooked functions?

Test cases ==========